[Comments-lgr-second-level-2-30mar20] Section 6

[Pitinan Kooarmornpatana]

This comment is posted on half of Bill Jouris < bill.jouris at insidethestack.com>  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

 

Section 6, paragraph (page 11) states: "[TLD] provides a definition of variant as well as suggests which variants are appropriate, and [TLD] adds additional information. The results of these projects can be seen as authoritative for script-based LGRs."  But for TLDs an extremely narrow definition of "variants" is used -- one which includes only those cases which not even a tiny fraction of the user population will notice.  A rather larger group (distinguishable by perhaps 10% of the population, while not noticed by the remaining 90%+) are classified as "confusables".  For them, a Similarity Review Panel is envisioned to conduct a manual review process.  

 

Is it planned that something similar will be done with SLDs?  Or will the "confusables" from the TLD project be included as "variants" here? 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-lgr-second-level-2-30mar20/attachments/20200511/7d5f9a8b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4610 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-lgr-second-level-2-30mar20/attachments/20200511/7d5f9a8b/smime-0001.p7s>