[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] (no subject)

Iain McKenna I.McKenna at bradfordcollege.ac.uk
Thu Apr 25 15:52:21 UTC 2019

I am a .org registrant.

ICANN should not unilaterally impose URS in legacy TLDs when that issue is precisely what is being examined by the volunteer ICANN Working Group who has been mandated to review this issue. ICANN policy making is supposed to be a 'bottom up, multi-stakeholder model'.

I believe that legacy gTLDs are fundamentally different from for-profit new gTLDs. Legacy TLDs are essentially a public trust, unlike new gTLDs which were created, bought and paid for by private interests. Registrants of legacy TLDs are entitled to price stability and predictability, and should not be subject to price increases with no maximums. Unlike new gTLDs, registrants of legacy TLDs registered their names and made their online presence on legacy TLDs on the basis that price caps would continue to exist.

Unrestrained price increases on the millions of .org registrants who are not-for-profits or non-profits would be unfair to them. Unchecked price increases have the potential to result in hundreds of millions of dollars being transferred from these organizations to one non-profit, the Internet Society, with .org registrants receiving no benefit in return. ICANN should not allow one non-profit nearly unlimited access to the funds of other non-profits.

ICANN appears to be entirely catering to registries by removing price caps. ICANN should stand up for the public interest and registrants!

Iain McKenna


This email transmission may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient and you have received this email and any attachment(s) in error, please use the reply function to notify us immediately and permanently delete the email and any attachment(s) from your computer and/or electronic device.   If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution, retention or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Bradford College and subsidiary companies within the Bradford College Group.

Bradford College and the Bradford College Group reserve the right to routinely monitor incoming and outgoing e-mail messages and cannot accept liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content and, as internet communications should not be considered as secure, for changes made to this message after it was sent.

This email was scanned for viruses by Sophos and on leaving our email domain was found to be virus and malware free.  You must take full responsibility for any subsequent virus or malware checking.

Visit our website<https://www.bradfordcollege.ac.uk/about/corporate-info/policies/data-protection> to find out more information regarding Bradford College and the Bradford College Group Data Protection (GDPR) Policy and Privacy Notices.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-org-renewal-18mar19/attachments/20190425/52070c62/attachment.html>

More information about the Comments-org-renewal-18mar19 mailing list