[Comments-org-renewal-18mar19] .org RA Renewal
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Mon Apr 29 21:35:28 UTC 2019
This comment regarding .ORG price caps is submitted solely on my own behalf.
In my mind, there are two salient issues:
1. ICANN's determination to have uniform Registry Agreements: this is
reasonable from a purely administrative point of view. I will point
out that this desire/requirement is an administrative and contract
issue and has never, been subject to a community decision. The .NET
agreement that just came into in 2017 did NOT follow this pattern of
alignment with the new "standard" RA, which demonstrates that there
are other viable options that ICANN sanctions.
2. .ORG is targeted (if not limited) to organizations that generally
are in the public interest. There are somewhat over 10 million .ORG
domains and it is reasonable to presume that many million of them are
public-service type organizations that have registered under .ORG
based on its perceived focus area but may well have presumed that the
price they paid to start would not increase radically.
PIR has regularly raised prices in the past. Although they have not
raised prices recently, they now have a new CEO and a new Chair of
the Board. Given that, past behaviour is NOT necessarily a predictor
of future actions. ICANN should take the prudent and public-interest
path and preserve caps on allowed price increases.
Alan
More information about the Comments-org-renewal-18mar19
mailing list