[Comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18] Clarification sought on RrSG public comment submission

Lars Hoffmann lars.hoffmann at icann.org
Wed Aug 8 13:08:44 UTC 2018


Dear Graeme,
I hope this finds you well. As we are summarizing the responses to the public comment on Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews, we noticed that the RrSG suggested<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/2018q3/000007.html> with regard to ATRT3: “as a mechanism to ensure the ATRT3 Review proceeds in a timely (and therefore budget friendly) manner, the RrSG would further suggest that it be led by experts rather than the whole community.” We interpret this as a suggestion to have the team chaired by a professional facilitator; did we understand that correctly?
We have cc-ed the public comment archive to make sure your response will become part of the public comment record.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Lars


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18/attachments/20180808/2dea92ae/attachment.html>


More information about the Comments-specific-reviews-short-term-timeline-14may18 mailing list