[council] Should we go ahead with the teleconference scheduled for 17 July 2003?

Demi Getschko demi at agestado.com.br
Fri Jul 11 18:23:30 UTC 2003


I'll be available for the eventual teleconference, but also
agree that if we don't have an agenda for this teleconf,
it will natural to cancel it.

demi

"ROESCH, LYNDA" wrote:

> I agree.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP [mailto:mcade at att.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 7:48 AM
> To: Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: council at dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [council] Should we go ahead with the teleconference
> scheduled for 17 July 2003?
>
> I am comfortable with canceling the July teleconference of Council.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Keller [mailto:tom at schlund.de]
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 6:57 AM
> To: Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: council at dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [council] Should we go ahead with the teleconference
> scheduled for 17 July 2003?
>
> I second this motion.
>
> tom
>
> Am 11.07.2003 schrieb Bruce Tonkin:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > We have scheduled a GNSO teleconference for 17 July 2003.
> > (see http://www.dnso.org/meetings.html).
> >
> > I am looking at formulating an agenda, and so far I have:
> > - update ICANN President's working group to consider WIPO
> > recommendations ( I haven't been able to get in touch with Paul Twomey
> > on this yet)
> > - staff managers report on UDRP (we haven't received this from ICANN
> > staff yet)
> > - budget report (mainly an update on transition to direct ICANN
> > management of GNSO website and secretariat)
> > - WHOIS Privacy steering group update (nothing has happened since
> > Montreal)
> >
> > We don't have any substantive policy documents to consider at this stage
> > (7 days prior to the meeting).
> >
> > I recommend that we cancel the teleconference scheduled for 17 July, and
> > plan for the next scheduled conference on 14 August 2003.
> >
> > In the meantime I will continue to work with the WHOIS Privacy Steering
> > group to select a chair, and establish contact with Paul Twomey
> > regarding the WIPO recommendations and the need for the UDRP report
> > (which is well overdue).  I also want to ensure that the outcome of the
> > deletes task force is properly communicated to ICANN and the GAC to
> > ensure it is ready for decision by the ICANN Board at its next meeting.
> >
> > Please let me know if there is any substantial reason to hold a meeting
> > on 17 July 2003.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bruce Tonkin
> > Chair
> >
> >
>
> Gruss,
>
> tom
>
> (__)
> (OO)_____
> (oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
>   | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
>   w w w  w
>
> *****************************************************************
> This email has been scanned by MailMax.
> http://www.maximizeit.net
> *****************************************************************
>
> *****************************************************************
> This electronic message transmission contains information from the law firm of Dinsmore & Shohl which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us by telephone (1-800-934-3477) or by electronic mail (netadmin at dinslaw.com) immediately.
> *****************************************************************




More information about the council mailing list