[council] GNSO Review TOR + Background Information
Ross Rader
ross at tucows.com
Wed Aug 31 13:38:08 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 31/08/2005 8:55 AM Liz Williams noted that;
> Could I ask you to review it - the Chair has asked for comments to be in by
> Friday 2 Sept Brussels COB. He will then forward an updated document to
> the Board for 8 Sept once any additional comments are taken into account.
I have several other less substantive comments, but this one is
significant enough to be submitted independently.
I have a substantial objection to section 3.2 and would like to see it
rephrased in substantially more positive and constructive terms.
Current:
3.2. The GNSO Review is designed to determine:
o whether that organization has a continuing purpose in the ICANN
structure,
o and, if so, whether any change in structure or operations is desirable
to improve its effectiveness.
Proposed:
3.2 The GNSO Review is designed to analyse:
o the current and continued role of the GNSO in the ICANN structure,
o and recommend what changes in its structure or operations, or those of
ICANN itself, may be desirable to improve its effectiveness.
- --
Regards,
-rwr
"Every contrivance of man, every tool, every instrument,
every utensil, every article designed for use, of each
and every kind, evolved from very simple beginnings."
- Robert Collier
Got Blog? http://www.blogware.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQFDFbLA6sL06XjirooRAjYWAJwLaKzJz6yVcHj2uI7Cfur+GKhcswCeN9cR
/NYr/gOAVYoF/3w+HSyI4Mo=
=5CMY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the council
mailing list