[council] Draft GNSO Council Agenda for Wednesday 12 April 2006

[Mawaki Chango]

Thanks Lucy for your effort in an attempt to reply to my question.
However, I'm still not sure if this addresses my lack of information.
I seem to know what WIPO is, and I have a bunch of guesses for DRP
(one of which is dispute resolution policy?) and for IGOs (one of
which is inter-governmental organizations?), but I still don't
understand why GNSO Council has a briefing about the "Paris
Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property" on a call at
this point in time, and not even (based on your answer) who is
concerned with developing a DRP for IGOs and what could be the
business of the council in this, if any.

Mawaki

--- Lucy.Nichols at nokia.com wrote:

> This refers to WIPO-II and concerns whether or not there is a legal
> basis for developing a DRP for IGOs.
> 
> Lucy
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On
> >Behalf Of ext Mawaki Chango
> >Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 12:54 PM
> >To: Council GNSO
> >Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO Council Agenda for Wednesday 12
> April
> 2006
> >
> >Hello Bruce,
> >
> >Maybe this is relevant only for those who were not in Wellington:
> >could we have a couple of sentences as to why we're having item 3
> on
> >the agenda? thanks, Mawaki
> >
> >--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>>>
> >> Item 3: Briefing by General Counsel's office on implications of
> >> Article 6ter(1)(a) and (b) of the Paris Convention for the
> >> Protection of Industrial Property:
> >>
>
>http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/paris/trtdocs_wo020.html#P155_22332
> >>
> >>
> >> This convention dates back to 1883 and was last amended in 1979.
> >>
> >> Note that the States that are signatories of this convention
> are:
> >> http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/documents/pdf/d-paris.pdf
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
>