[council] RE: GNSO Review: Updated information (was ICANN Board call)
Liz Williams
liz.williams at icann.org
Wed Feb 22 10:47:07 UTC 2006
Yes, of course. See you in DC over the weekend. I arrive on
Thursday evening.
Liz
.....................................................
Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob
On 22 Feb 2006, at 11:42, Marilyn Cade wrote:
> Thanks, Liz. Very helpful to have the list of all the links in one
> place.
>
>
>
> However, I still have some questions. Since you are traveling over
> for the Council Working group meeting in D.C., we can discuss this
> topic under AOB on the agenda.
>
>
>
> From: Liz Williams [mailto:liz.williams at icann.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:41 AM
> To: Marilyn Cade
> Cc: council at gnso.icann.org; pritz at icann.org; jeffrey at icann.org;
> twomey at icann.org
> Subject: GNSO Review: Updated information (was ICANN Board call)
>
>
>
> Marilyn and Council Colleagues
>
>
>
> As the senior staff member responsible for the GNSO Review, I will
> soon be able to provide much more detailed information on the way
> in which the Review will be proceeding now that the appropriate
> formalities from last night's Board meeting are completed.
>
>
>
> For the benefit of Council members who have not been involved in
> the establishment of the Review, I've provided some easy to
> navigate background. I hope this also helps other Council members
> with their preparation for the Review.
>
>
>
> 1. The July 2005 Luxembourg Resolution initiated the Review and
> started a process of discussion between the Board, Council, and
> Staff on the establishment of the Terms of Reference. (http://
> www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-15jul05.htm#p4)
>
>
>
> 2. The December 2005 Vancouver Resolution approved the Terms of
> Reference which had been developed in consultation with individual
> members of the Board, Council and Staff (http://www.icann.org/
> minutes/resolutions-04dec05.htm.) A 21 day public comment period
> about the draft Terms of Reference was conducted between 27 October
> 2005 and 17 November 2005. The archive of comments is at http://
> forum.icannorg/lists/gnso-review-tor/
>
>
>
> 3. The 14 December 2005 ICANN website posting sought requests for
> proposals from independent evaluators (http://www.icann.org/
> announcements/announcement-14dec05.htm).
>
>
>
> 4. The 21 Feb 2006 Board Resolution approved the appointment of an
> independent team of evaluators but is not available online as yet.
>
>
>
> 5. Background documents on the GNSO Review can be found at http://
> www.icann.org/gnso/review-tor-background-04nov05.htm. These
> include the recommendations from the GNSO Council Review, the
> relevant ICANN By laws and other helpful information.
>
>
>
> 6. The Terms of Reference can be found at http://www.icann.org/
> gnso/review-reference-terms-27oct05.htm.
>
>
>
> 7. Article IV Section 4 of ICANN's Bylaws (http://www.icann.org/
> general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-08apr05.htm#IV) gives guidance about
> the conduct of the review and I've copied it here for easy
> reference. I have added some emphasis which may provide
> clarification about the process.
>
>
>
> 1. The Board shall cause a periodic review, if feasible no less
> frequently than every three years, of the performance and operation
> of each Supporting Organization, each Supporting Organization
> Council, each Advisory Committee (other than the Governmental
> Advisory Committee), and the Nominating Committee by an entity or
> entities independent of the organization under review. The goal of
> the review, to be undertaken pursuant to such criteria and
> standards as the Board shall direct, shall be to determine (i)
> whether that organization has a continuing purpose in the ICANN
> structure, and (ii) if so, whether any change in structure or
> operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness. The results
> of such reviews shall be posted on the Website for public review
> and comment, and shall be considered by the Board no later than the
> second scheduled meeting of the Board after such results have been
> posted for 30 days. The consideration by the Board includes the
> ability to revise the structure or operation of the parts of ICANN
> being reviewed by a two-thirds vote of all members of the Board.
>
>
>
> Finally, ICANN Bylaws Article X, Section 5 which deals with the
> GNSO's operating procedures.
>
>
>
> Of course, any further questions are more than welcome.
>
>
>
> Liz
>
> .....................................................
>
>
>
> Liz Williams
>
> Senior Policy Counselor
>
> ICANN - Brussels
>
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
>
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
>
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 22 Feb 2006, at 01:43, Marilyn Cade wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The fact that the gNSO review has been finalized, a briefing of the
> Council on the “proposed approach” is of concern. This was supposed
> to be a joint effort by the Board and the Council and we are sadly
> without "visibility" into the process, or the outline, or the
> proposal. Or the funding amount, which I have asked for twice, on
> Council calls.
>
>
>
> This is something that I propose that Council bring up with the
> President/CEO and Senior staff. I had noted it on the Board agenda,
> but never envisioned that there would be an approval, without
> discussion with the Council.
>
> No doubt that is planned, but Senior Staff are seeking still to
> schedule a discussion with Council.
>
>
>
> We can help them by initiating this discussion. Let’s spend five
> minutes on agenda bashing on our upcoming Council meeting on Friday.
>
>
>
> Marilyn Cade
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-
> council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:57 PM
> To: council at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: [council] ICANN Board Call
>
>
>
> Dear Council Members:
>
>
>
> The ICANN Board just concluded its teleconference today and took the
>
> following actions.
>
>
>
> (1) Approval of São Paulo, Brazil as the venue for the 2006 ICANN
> annual
>
> meeting the first week in December; and
>
>
>
> (2) Approved funds to pay the evaluators for their work in connection
>
> with the review of the GNSO;
>
>
>
> Although there was a discussion regarding the VeriSign settlement
>
> negotiation, there was no action taking. There is a scheduled call for
>
> next week 28-Feb-2006. Although the Chair and secretariat have not yet
>
> finalized the agenda for that call it is most likely to involve
> further
>
> VeriSign discussions as well as those items which have not yet been
>
> completed from today's call. As always, I will try to keep the council
>
> informed of any developments.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Michael D. Palage
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20060222/ef6ac114/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list