[council] Draft Call for papers, new gTLD PDP

Ross Rader ross at tucows.com
Wed Jan 4 19:21:55 UTC 2006

Bret Fausett wrote:
> The only 
> way around the tight deadlines in the bylaws, as I see it, is to 
> narrowly scope the issues under consideration and complete several small 
> PDPs in a row to accomplish large tasks. In other words, if we feel the 
> need to extend the time set forth in the bylaws, the better approach is 
> to scale down the issue under consideration.

Precisely my feeling.

The corollary to this is that each constituency would need to give some 
thought as to how they will each contribute to a smaller, more focused 
process. Right now, most constituencies have structured their processes 
such that long timelines are required simply to appoint a representative 
to a task force - getting concrete contributions from them is a larger 
task still.


More information about the council mailing list