[council] PDP timelines
Mawaki Chango
ki_chango at yahoo.com
Thu Jan 5 22:20:44 UTC 2006
Hello all,
Bruce, Avri,...
--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
> Hello Avri,
>
> > >
> >
> > I think in most cases, in my experience at least,
> projects that do
> > not complete on time are reviewed and extended only if
> warranted.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Automatic sunset that disregards complexity or issues
> does
> > not seem the best alternative to me. It seems that any
>
> > notion of concluding a PDP must require a definitive
> action,
> > e.g. a vote, as opposed to some automatic mechanism.
> >
>
> I would have thought that should be the other way around.
> Any extension
> of a deadline/project requires a definitive vote.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce
>
I don't see a contradiction here. The outcome of a "normal"
PDP is to have a policy developed. I understand what Avri
means by "concluding a PDP" as being the same as the notion
of "drop dead" mentioned earlier. In both cases, whether
"concluding" or extending, there is a need for a
"definitive action", or an ad hoc or a case-specific
decision making process, since the immediate outcome would
be other than the (normal) one expected.
Mawaki
More information about the council
mailing list