[Fwd: [council] Summary of LSE constituency input]
Denise Michel
denise.michel at icann.org
Fri Feb 23 10:32:13 UTC 2007
Following-up on Bruce's request -- would you please send your
constituency's edits to the attached chart to the GNSO Secretariat
<gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org> by Friday, 2 March. Please let Glen
know if you need more time.
Again, this chart will be used to inform the Board Governance Committee
and will help form a basis for selecting a few recommendations relating
to major structural issues for public discussion in Lisbon. We are
scheduling a public forum on Monday in Lisbon to discuss GNSO Improvements.
Thanks.
Denise
Denise Michel
Vice President, Policy Development
ICANN www.icann.org
denise.michel at icann.org
-------- Original Message --------
Hello All,
I asked the staff to summarise the views of each of the constituencies
on the LSE report.
Each recommendation is ranked in terms of level of support for the
recommendation, and priority for implementing the recommendation.
The rankings are high, medium, low.
This draft table has been prepared based on the inputs to the public
forum.
The recommendations have also been broken into the following categories:
- participation
- rules
- structure
- tools-support
- working procedures
Please review and advise ICANN staff of any corrections.
The purpose of this document will be to help inform the Board Governance
Committee and also form a basis for selecting a few recommendations
(such as recommendation 19) for public discussion in Lisbon. The aim
is to focus discuss on major structural issues in Lisbon, rather than
debate whether the website could be better.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Copy of LSE-Review-clusters constituencies.xls
Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Size: 29696 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20070223/ac1293ec/CopyofLSE-Review-clustersconstituencies.xls>
More information about the council
mailing list