[council] Statement of work for working group on reserved names - DRAFT for Council

[Ross Rader]

two comments after a quick review -

a) Prior to any discussion of (iv) and (v)WG should have discussion  
and make precedent recommendations regarding whether or not there is  
any merit in a) adding new names to existing reservations lists, b)  
taking names off of existing reservations lists and c) whether or not  
reservations lists, in general, are appropriate policy to continue  
forward with.

b) voting should probably be along constituency lines - i.e. one vote  
per constituency. I don't think each constituency should be required  
to appoint three members to this TF just to ensure it gets the full  
defensive benefit of having three full votes. This can be avoided by  
simply having one vote per constituency.

-r

On 11-Jan-07, at 5:52 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote:

> <DraftStatementofWorkforWorkingGrouponReservedNames.doc>