[council] Regarding dealing with inappropriate behaviour

[Sophia B]

>
>      But it also taught me that often the judgement between constructive
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >      disruptive was subjective and a matter of 'political'
> > > > > > > perspective.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >  It also taught me that unless there are formal processes and
> > > > > > procedures as well as levels of appeal, the solution is often
> > > > > > far
> > > > > > worse then the infraction.
> > > > >
> > > > >
Good points Avri,
 as technologist, let us be reminded how *'disruptive technologies'* have
contributed to reinventing our economies, the minds set comes with it.

We are also entering into a self-organizing state of affairs globally like
the Ant Empire, where everything works without the Queen Ant calling the
shots, but she still maintains her authority, which is none really.

I hope this was not in itself disruptive on is own;)
Sophia



On 02/03/07, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 2 mar 2007, at 12.10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> > For those of us who have been around for awhile, we have definitely
> > encountered situtations where group members were not constructive
> > but rather were disruptive.
>
> Over two decades in the IETF certainly taught me that.  But it also
> taught me that often the judgement between constructive and
> disruptive was subjective and a matter of 'political' perspective.
> It also taught me that unless there are formal processes and
> procedures as well as levels of appeal, the solution is often far
> worse then the infraction.
>
> Unfortunately the time spent developing such procedures is also often
> far more destructive and time consuming then just learning to ignore
> the trolls.
>
>
> a.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20070302/51b3f781/attachment.html>