[council] Rationale of thresholds for initiating issues reports and PDPs
ki_chango at yahoo.com
Fri May 25 03:28:36 UTC 2007
--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
> I believe this was to prevent the GNSO Council becoming a
> barrier for
> 2-3 constituencies deciding to investigate a matter.
> I note that none of these issues appeared to come up in the
> GNSO review
> process - ie the thresholds for issues reports did not seem to
> come up
> as an area of concern. So I am assuming that the Board will
> not wish
> to change them.
It makes perfect sense.
I note that you carefully :) set aside in your next email my
first consclusion and question about the weighted vote: Is there
any type of vote where each registry and registrar rep does not
count for 2 votes, or is it so for all votes the council take?
> Bruce Tonkin
More information about the council