[council] Rationale of thresholds for initiating issues reports and PDPs

[Mawaki Chango]

Hello Bruce,

--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
 
> 
> I believe this was to prevent the GNSO Council becoming a
> barrier for
> 2-3 constituencies deciding to investigate a matter.   
> 
[snip]

> I note that none of these issues appeared to come up in the
> GNSO review
> process - ie the thresholds for issues reports did not seem to
> come up
> as an area of concern.   So I am assuming that the Board will
> not wish
> to change them.

It makes perfect sense.

I note that you carefully :) set aside in your next email my
first consclusion and question about the weighted vote: Is there
any type of vote where each registry and registrar rep does not
count for 2 votes, or is it so for all votes the council take?
thanks,

Mawaki

> 
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>