[council] Re: An issue or not an issue - that is the question

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Fri May 25 09:20:22 UTC 2007


In principle I agree with this approach.

I would have preferred waiting to ask the staff to do this until the  
new GTLD process was completed.  As it stands, once we ask for the  
report, we are on a timetable.  And though we don't do a very good  
job of following the time table in any case and are hoping for a  
rationalization of the timing in the PDP in the future, i think it  
better to not start something we cannot follow through on.


On 25 maj 2007, at 11.01, Philip Sheppard wrote:

> Avri,
> all new activities have resource implications.
> Council should timetable its priorities based on the list of  
> identified issues that we wish
> to do something about.
> There is no shame in identifying an issue today and then agreeing  
> to start a PDP on it in 6
> months time based on an assessment of priority and resource.
> Indeed, this may be sound management.
> Philip

More information about the council mailing list