[council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform

Avri Doria avri at psg.com
Mon Nov 26 20:25:36 UTC 2007


seems simpler and more understandable.

while my tortured sense of logic was fine with the other, i see why  
this is more understandable especially since we then go and give our  



On 26 nov 2007, at 20.35, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> So we are sayiing "we unanimously partially support the  
> recommendation"?  Sounds a little confusing to me.  At the same  
> time, note that in my response to Philip just sent a couple minutes  
> ago, I suggested "Qualified Support".  I think it may be an  
> improvement to say "we unanimously support a recommendation with  
> qualifications".

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20071126/51e7ca44/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list