[council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform
Avri Doria
avri at psg.com
Mon Nov 26 20:25:36 UTC 2007
hi,
seems simpler and more understandable.
while my tortured sense of logic was fine with the other, i see why
this is more understandable especially since we then go and give our
qualification.
thanks
a.
On 26 nov 2007, at 20.35, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> So we are sayiing "we unanimously partially support the
> recommendation"? Sounds a little confusing to me. At the same
> time, note that in my response to Philip just sent a couple minutes
> ago, I suggested "Qualified Support". I think it may be an
> improvement to say "we unanimously support a recommendation with
> qualifications".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20071126/51e7ca44/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list