[council] Draft reply Council on GNSO reform

Philip Sheppard philip.sheppard at aim.be
Tue Nov 27 09:54:46 UTC 2007

Tom, Tim
I certainly have sympathy for trying to be clear on language !
Of course we can strike out the entire section of working groups but that seems a pity if we
are all close to agreement and just need to get the words right.
Forget the wording of the paper for the moment are you saying Tom and Tim that:
a) you support ONLY working groups OR   (like the BGC)
b) you support mostly working groups for big PDPs but want flexibility for other types of
group OR (Council's current wording)
c) you want full flexibility for WGS, TFs etc with no special preference for one over the
other - its best to decide per issue (more flexible than Council's current wording).
It would be helpful to know which of these 3 options are yours (or if I have missed an
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20071127/370c3626/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list