[council] RyC Confusingly Similar Statement

Adrian Kinderis adrian at ausregistry.com.au
Thu Apr 17 23:22:05 UTC 2008



Can we expect to see a response to my clarification email any time soon?


Sorry to be a pest...


Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director

AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian at ausregistry.com <mailto:adrian at ausregistry.com> 
Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com <http://www.ausregistryinternational.com/> 


The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.


From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, 18 April 2008 8:11 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Cc: David W. Maher
Subject: RE: [council] RyC Confusingly Similar Statement


We have learned, to our embarrassment, that one paragraph of the RyC Confusingly Similar Statement I distributed to the Council list on 10 April is incorrect. 
The paragraph that reads, "For example, assume that different registry operators were approved for .Munich and .München. If a cybersquatter registered  the domain names XYZ.Munich and XYZ.München, then the owner of the trademark XYZ would have to file two separate complaints under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP).  Also, the implementation of a panel decision against the cybersquatter would need to involve both registries, but, if both gTLDs were registered with the same registry, that complication could be avoided." should be deleted (or ignored) since it does not accurately reflect the procedural rules of the URDP.


Thanks to Mike Rodenbaugh for pointing this error out.





From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:31 AM
To: Council GNSO
Cc: Maher, David
Subject: [council] RyC Confusingly Similar Statement

Here's a statement developed by the RyC regarding New gTLD Recommendation 2, hopefully providing some new thoughts in that regard.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20080418/21f04bf7/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list