[council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach

[Philip Sheppard]

Chuck, thanks for your first thoughts on this.
My concern about "GNSO flexibility" as you put it  is that the flexibility at present is
100% in the users house!
There is zero flexibility in the contract parties house.
 
In other words its contract parties (a fixed two constituency group)  and the rest of the
world in the users house.
 
This fits poorly to the "birds of a feather" concept and the idea of new constituencies.
The relationships between users and the three types i mentioned are a direct parallel to the
contract parties.
 
Can you provide an example of a new constituency for the contract parties house  (that is
not a splinter group) ?
 
Philip
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20081208/70691765/attachment.html>