[council] Further Draft of GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report - for discussion
Avri Doria
avri at psg.com
Tue Dec 9 04:53:27 UTC 2008
Hi,
At this point, I believe that I should submit Philip's cover letter
with Rob's staff report on the status of the work being done.
This seems to be a compromise between Chuck's optimism and Philip's
caution. I will not add any comment to the effect that we may now be
questioning some of the reasoning behind the bifurcation that produced
the proposal fr bi-cameral organization.
Thanks.
a.
On 7 Dec 2008, at 15:19, Robert Hoggarth wrote:
> Dear Council Members;
>
> Many thanks to Chuck Gomes for helpful feedback on the last version
> of the draft document. In view of the lack of comments to Chuck’s
> feedback, I decided to circulate a further revised draft version of
> the GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report that incorporates
> some of his suggestions in hopes that the changes will make it
> easier for Council members to review and comment. This version
> leaves Chuck’s previous comments in place.
>
> Thanks to Ken Bour’s thoughtful contribution and formatting wizardry
> this draft version has converted the draft key process and
> implementation decision inventory into a chronological chart. The
> new format should make it easier for all council members to evaluate
> and comment on the inventory and draft chronology and allow faster
> and more efficient editing.
>
> In light of another comment from Chuck, I also added some edits to
> the Calendar section in February and March with respect to the
> timing for submitting new Stakeholder Group charters. All should
> note that the charter submission deadline will arrive sooner than
> you might otherwise have anticipated.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rob Hoggarth
>
>
> On 12/5/08 5:19 AM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Rob. To get the discussion going, I inserted some comments
> along with a few minor edits that are highlighted on the attached
> file.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org
> ] On Behalf Of Robert Hoggarth
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 11:40 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] For Discussion - Draft GNSO Council Restructure
> Implementation Report
>
>
> Dear Council Members;
>
> Based on the active email discussion prior to Thanksgiving, I have
> taken the liberty of creating a new draft version of the Council’s
> required report to the Board on its plans for transitioning to the
> new bicameral Council structure by June 2009.
>
> I addition to using some specific text recommendations by Philip
> Sheppard and Chuck Gomes in the introductory section, I am hopeful
> that I have gotten close to capturing the spirit of the Council’s
> discussion on this matter to date. There are a number of notable
> changes to which I draw your attention:
>
>
> • I added a section suggested by Philip that highlights
> “fundamental community principles to be followed.”
> • I added a section suggested by Chuck that highlights “Council
> implementation priorities.”
> • I streamlined the “Calendar/Deadlines” section but did not
> combine/integrate that section with the “Inventory of Key Processes
> and Implementation Decisions” section, pending a final resolution
> of that list and a decision by the Council on the order of priority.
>
> Consistent with your discussion during the last Council meeting, I
> hope this draft version will make it possible for all interested
> parties to edit, comment and move toward a Council agreement on the
> list so that a status report can be submitted to the Board by early
> next week.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rob Hoggarth
>
>
> <GNSO Council Restructuring Implementation Plan (RHv3; CGv1; KBv1)7
> Dec 08.doc>
More information about the council
mailing list