[council] RAA Motion

[Rosette, Kristina]

Thanks for your work on this, Chuck.  Because I do not agree that "there
is strong support for the agreed-to amendments" across the entire ICANN
community, I suggest that that language be removed or, alternatively,
revised to indicate the segments of the community within which there is
strong support.
 
K


________________________________

	From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
	Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:59 AM
	To: Council GNSO
	Subject: [council] RAA Motion
	
	
	Attached and copied below is a motion regarding the revised RAA
for consideration of the Council in our 18 Dec meeting.
	 
	Chuck
	 
	RAA Motion for GNSO Council - 11 Dec 08

	 

	Whereas:

	 

	*	ICANN has undertaken a lengthy consultative process
related to amending the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA). 
	*	In response to community input via that process, ICANN
Staff and the Registrars Constituency agreed on a set of proposed
amendments to the Registry Registrar Agreement (RAA). 
	*	There is strong support for those agreed-to amendments,
albeit many have suggested that the amendments should go further. 
	*	The current terms in the RAA date back to 1999 and many
have needed revision for years.

	 

	Resolve:

	 

	*	The GNSO Council asks Staff to work with registrars and
the Council to define the most expeditious process for implementing the
agreed-to proposed amendments to the RAA as soon as possible. 
	*	The GNSO Council will form a drafting team to review the
superset of proposed RAA issues and amendments not addressed in the
presently proposed and agreed-to amendments and develop a request for an
Issues Report, including clear identification of the policy issues that
are involved.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20081211/860f3de0/attachment.html>