[council] Response to ccNSO/GAC Issues report
Avri Doria
avri at psg.com
Tue Feb 12 09:43:27 UTC 2008
On 12 Feb 2008, at 14:29, Robin Gross wrote:
>
> **** THEREFORE, I propose that we amend our statement, so that only
> "technical confusion" is the type of confusion that we deal with.
> Otherwise, not only are we in contrast with legal norms, we are also
> outside the scope of ICANN's authority.
Can you suggest the exact wording change you are proposing?
As with other suggested changes, I believe we can make if there are no
objections.
On the other hand, if there are objections, we may need to vote on
this amendment before voting on the response itself.
thanks
a.
More information about the council
mailing list