[council] Whois study suggetsions

[Thomas Keller]

Hi Liz, all,

I do not think that it would be a problem for persons/groups to identify 
themselvs in the mail body. I'm not aware of any kind of automated 
redaction at this point.

Best,

tom

liz.gasster schrieb:
> Thanks Kristina.  Apparently that redaction feature is a straightforward
> algorithm in email but is more complex to employ to delete partial portions
> of text in an on-line form.  I'm sure it could be mastered nonetheless.  I
> was excited to get the online form working given time deadlines and opted
> for prudence and expediency.  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 1:29 PM
> To: liz.gasster at icann.org; Thomas Keller
> Cc: council at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: RE: [council] Whois study suggetsions
>
>
> Steve DelBianco submitted them on behalf of NetChoice.  He gave me
> permission to REVEAL and asked that I let you all know he is happy to answer
> any questions anyone may have about the study proposals.  
>
> Liz, I know that some - but not all - of my contact information is redacted
> when I post to the Council list from my Blackberry (which has that pesky
> automatic e-signature).  Perhaps the method used there could be cross
> applied here?
>
>
>
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On
> Behalf Of liz.gasster
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:13 PM
> To: 'Thomas Keller'
> Cc: council at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: RE: [council] Whois study suggetsions
>
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Yes, I take your overall point!  As to the details of how this came about,
> the answer has more of a technical reason, not so much a policy rationale.
> I wanted to solicit full reach information (which is not usually the case
> for public comments) so that I could follow up and ask clarifying questions
> if need be, without revealing all info to the world, but couldn't separate
> the "name and affiliation" from the reach info, so we opted to blank out all
> from the public view.  
>
> I guess I'll operate like an OPOC in this case...I will RELAY but not
> REVEAL!
>
> Liz
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Thomas Keller
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:50 AM
> To: 'GNSO.SECRETARIAT at GNSO.ICANN.ORG'; 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: AW: [council] Whois study suggetsions
>
>
> Hello,
>
> What strikes me as very strange is that everyone who registeres a domain
> name in the gTLD world will be held out to the public but persons/groups
> that suggest further studies on this issue are
>
> Submitted By:
> [Redacted for privacy reasons]
>
> protected.
>
> Best,
>
> tom
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im
> Auftrag von GNSO.SECRETARIAT at GNSO.ICANN.ORG
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 19:52
> An: 'Council GNSO'
> Betreff: [council] Whois study suggetsions
>
>
> Dear Council members,
>
> The 3 study suggestion responses to topics of study on WHOIS may be directly
> viewed at:
>
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/msg00001.html
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/msg00002.html
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/msg00003.html
>
> These are published on page:
> http://www.icann.org/public_comment/
> and by clicking on the link at the bottom of the text marked [comments],
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/
> the studies may be seen along with any comments that may be submitted.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions.
> Thanks you.
> Kind regards,
>
> Glen
>
> --
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>