[council] WHOIS study group report attached

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Liz.
 
Chuck


________________________________

	From: Liz Gasster [mailto:liz.gasster at icann.org] 
	Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 7:51 AM
	To: Gomes, Chuck; council at gnso.icann.org
	Subject: RE: [council] WHOIS study group report attached
	
	

	Chuck and all,

	 

	I understand your point about "self-contained" reports and will keep that in mind in the future. I worry about the bulkiness of these documents as well as ease of reference but your point is well-taken, especially with a report of this nature.  Here is the reference guide in Word format that you can refer back to.  If this is still awkward, let me know and I'll come up with an easier format.  There are multiple studies under consideration for each of 7 categories.  In the final report we also included an 8th category which lists a few studies that the GAC recommended that had not previously been raised by others.  The numbers in the "tally" annex do relate to the 7 original categories.

	 

	Everyone was asked to rank the study categories in priority order.  The RyC offered a more nuanced position and the tally attempts to reflect the high points of that position.  I probably should also have included their statement in full, it is attached here for the group's reference.  

	 

	Thanks so much for the input and I am happy to answer any other questions.

	 

	Liz

	 

	From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com] 
	Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:44 PM
	To: Liz Gasster; council at gnso.icann.org
	Subject: RE: [council] WHOIS study group report attached

	 

	Thanks for this report Liz.  It was helpful for me to read the rationale provided by each side, but I found it difficult without going to other documents to readily understand study categories and study numbers.  I have a few questions and comments in that regard.

	 

	Am I correct in concluding that there are multiple studies under consideration for each category?  If that is the case, it would be helpful to have the individual studies identified in the report, possibly in an Annex.  That would also have made it easier to figure out what studies were being referenced when the study # was given.  It is my opinion that reports like this should be as self-contained as possible without making them too bulky; otherwise, it becomes extremely time consuming for those who did not directly participate to read and understand the material.

	 

	Am I correct that the numbers in the table in Annex 1 refer to priorities 1-7 and that those who provided the priorities ranked the seven categories?  Was everyone asked to do the same thing in this regard?  I note that the RyC response is very different from the rest.and tough to correlate with the other data.

	 

	The purpose of my questions and comments are two-fold: 1) to make sure I understand the report; 2) to possibly identify ways that reports like this could be improved in the future. 

	 

	Chuck

	 

	 

		 

		
________________________________


		From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
		Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 2:53 PM
		To: council at gnso.icann.org
		Subject: [council] WHOIS study group report attached

		Council members:

		 

		Attached please find the final report of the WHOIS study group, which was convened by the Council on 27 March to examine the study recommendations suggested by the public (and later augmented with study suggestions recommended by the Government Advisory Committee), and to make a recommendation to the Council. 

		 

		Also, in the course of discussions on further studies of WHOIS, study participants asked for more information on IRIS and specifically more information about what it would take to implement IRIS from both a technical and policy perspective.  Steve Crocker has provided an email response (also attached), and has also offered to participate in a Q & A or broader discussion, at which SSAC experts could have a dialogue with the GNSO Council and constituency representatives.  Staff would be happy to coordinate such a conversation at the Council's request.

		 

		The WHOIS study group would be glad to answer questions about the report and our deliberation process.

		 

		Thanks, Liz Gasster

		 

		Study group participants:  

		 

		Jordi Iparraguirre 

		Ken Stubbs 

		David Maher 

		Steve Metalitz  

		Lee Eulgen 

		Steve DelBianco 

		Tony Harris 

		Tim Ruiz 

		Paul Stahura 

		James Bladel 

		Stéphane Van Gelder 

		Norbert Klein 

		Robin Gross 

		Danny Younger

		Beau Brendler

		Wendy Seltzer

		Liz Gasster - staff

		 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20080529/06c3927f/attachment.html>