[council] Draft AoC Review Teams Proposal Summary

[Olga Cavalli]

Chuck,
Thanks for the summary.
I think that GNSO representation is low, and we should be allowed to
have one representative from each of the houses in the review teams.
I would like to volunteer myself for representing GNSO in the
Accountability and Transparency Review Team.
In this sense and once the plan for identifying volunteers is defined,
I would appreciate GNSO Council to considering this offer.
Happy new year to all!!
Regards
Olga



2009/12/30 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes at verisign.com>:
> Attached is my personal summary of the ICANN Draft Proposal for AoC Review
> Teams.  I welcome all to review it and correct any inaccuracies.
>
> It appears to me that the Council has two possible action items regarding
> this both of which are time sensitive:
>
> 1. Decide whether we want to submit comments from the Council and, if so,
> develop a plan for doing that in our 7 Jan meetinAccountability & Transparency Review g.  Note that comments are
> due the end of January.
>
> 2. Develop a plan for identifying volunteers to nominate for each of the
> four review teams.  Because the will
> start early in 2010, we should start work on this right away.
>
> Glen - Please add the following under AOB for our 7 Jan meeting:
>
> 7.2.1 Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams
>
> 7.2.1.1 Brief review of the proposal
>
> 7.2.1.2 Should the Council submit comments on behalf of the GNSO?  If so,
> develop plan.
>
> 7.2.1.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as nominees for each of the
> four review teams?  (Next steps?)
>
> All - Please review the attached file and the two reference documents named
> at the beginning of the document.
>
> Chuck