[council] Community Travel support Procedure for Mexico City

[Greg Ruth]

Doug,
      I agree with Philip - by far the easiest way to untie this Gordian knot is simply to fund travel for all GNSO councilors.
Greg



________________________________
From: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard at aim.be>
To: Doug Brent <doug.brent at icann.org>
Cc: Denise Michel <denise.michel at icann.org>; GNSO Council <council at gnso.icann.org>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 4:31:58 AM
Subject: [council] Community Travel support Procedure for Mexico City


Doug, 
thank you for explaining the current thinking re community travel support.
I am not going to take issue with questions of US fiduciary responsibility though do note we
are talking about less than 0.3% of ICANN's budget.
Tax authorities would have to be grossly overstaffed to bother about this.

If however you at present can only operate a system of pre-approvals then the solution is
clear.
Increase the budget to allow for the funding of all GNSO Councilors on a pre-approval basis.
(This will still not exceed 0.6% of the total ICANN budget).

That will end the divisive and impossible position that the present arrangements have forced
upon Council.

The tiny amount required is surely within your 2009 contingency so could be implemented
immediately.

Philip


      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20090112/4fe0d818/attachment.html>