[council] Re: Council vote on by-laws (from Stéphane)

William Drake william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
Mon Jul 13 10:55:35 UTC 2009



Begin forwarded message:

> From: Stephvg2 <stephvg2 at gmail.com>
> Date: July 13, 2009 12:49:25 PM GMT+02:00
> To: William Drake <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch>
> Cc: Tim Ruiz <tim at godaddy.com>, Avri Doria <avri at psg.com>
> Subject: Re: [council] Council vote on by-laws
>
> I agree that Tim's approach is sensible. But if we're aiming for  
> maximum transparency, I would also like it be recorded that in my  
> message before the meeting stating I would be unable to participate,  
> I said I would vote in favor. This may also be useful info for the  
> Board.
>
> I'm not sure I can post to the Council list from this, my secondary  
> email address, so perhaps one of you would be kind enough to forward  
> this message to the Council list.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>
> Le 13 juil. 2009 à 11:03, William Drake <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch 
> > a écrit :
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Avri's proposed approach is sensible and would be NCUC's  
>> preference.  However, if there's overwhelming sentiment that  
>> differentiated reporting is needed, it would be better to respect  
>> board members' intelligence and dispense with the transparent  
>> spinning.  Tim's approach would be preferable in that context.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> On Jul 10, 2009, at 5:42 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Would it be okay to report the vote something like this:
>>>
>>> 13 Votes in favor:
>>> Tim Ruiz (RrC) 2 votes
>>> Chuck Gomes (RyC) 2 votes
>>> Avri Doria (NCA) 1 vote
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> 1 Vote against:
>>> Cyril Chua (IPC) 1 vote
>>>
>>> Abstained:
>>> Kristina Rosette (IPC) Statement
>>> William Drake (NCUC) Statement
>>>
>>> Not present:
>>> Philip Sheppard (CBUC)
>>> Anthony Harris (ISPC)
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [council] Council vote on by-laws
>>> From: "Anthony Harris" <harris at cabase.org.ar>
>>> Date: Fri, July 10, 2009 9:33 am
>>> To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard at aim.be>, "'Council GNSO'"
>>> <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Avri,
>>>
>>> Perhaps, in this sunset of the GNSO as we
>>> have known it, you may see your way to
>>> accomodating this rather simple request from
>>> three of the existing constituencies.
>>>
>>> I beleive that all of us are trying to get the
>>> restructuring process "right", and certain
>>> issues are important to some rather than to
>>> others. I think the Board deserves to be
>>> aware of this.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Tony Harris
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard at aim.be>
>>> To: "'Council GNSO'" <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 10:28 AM
>>> Subject: [council] Council vote on by-laws
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Avri,
>>>> this request is about transparency and relevance.
>>>> It is a formal request from the BC.
>>>> Philip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ***********************************************************
>> William J. Drake
>> Senior Associate
>> Centre for International Governance
>> Graduate Institute of International and
>> Development Studies
>> Geneva, Switzerland
>> william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
>> www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
>> ***********************************************************
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20090713/15513641/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list