[council] Topic for Sunday night Dinner in Sydney

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Wed May 27 15:20:20 UTC 2009


Philip,

I believe that the term 'overarching" is used because that is
specifically what ICANN Staff used in referring to the four overarching
issues, two of which are included.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org 
> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:13 AM
> To: 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: [council] Topic for Sunday night Dinner in Sydney
> 
> 
> Avri,
> I support your list and the suggestions to date.
> I have one question on vocabulary.
> 
> You use the word "overarching" in:
> - Pending issue in restructuring
> - overarching issue for new gTLDs - IRT
> - overarching issue for new gTLDs - geographic names
> 
> 
> Do you intend to mean all-embracing, or more precisely, that 
> these are issues which in Council's opinion require 
> resolution before TLD expansion can proceed?
> If this is the case (and I would agree) then maybe a clearer 
> term is needed.
> 
> May I suggest either "threshold" or perhaps better "critical-path" ?
> 
> Philip
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




More information about the council mailing list