[council] Motion To Approve Clarifying Edits to GNSO Operating Procedures

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Wolf.  Nothing has changed the motion you reference so your
understanding is valid.  The GCOT is continuing to work on the
abstention issue.
 
Chuck


________________________________

	From: KnobenW at telekom.de [mailto:KnobenW at telekom.de] 
	Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 1:42 AM
	To: Gomes, Chuck; council at gnso.icann.org
	Subject: AW: [council] Motion To Approve Clarifying Edits to
GNSO Operating Procedures
	
	
	 
	 

	Chuck, 

	I second the motion by understanding that the motion resolved at
the Seoul meeting regarding abstentions is still valid:
	 
	<<
	
	...
	Resolved, the GNSO Council operating procedures defined in XYZ
are
	accepted with the following proviso:  Paragraph 4.2, dealing
with the
	subject of counting of abstentions is approved only as an
interim
	solution.  The GNSO Council operations work team (GCOT) is
requested
	to review this item and recommend a further solution by November
25th
	in 2009.
	...
	>>




	Best regards 
	Wolf-Ulrich 

	 

________________________________

	Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
	Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. November 2009 23:09
	An: Council GNSO
	Betreff: [council] Motion To Approve Clarifying Edits to GNSO
Operating Procedures
	
	
	In my capacity of chair of the OSC, I hereby make the following
motion for action in our 23 Nov 09 Council meeting.  Because the link is
not yet available for the clean and redline versions of the changes, I
attached them to this message.  A second is requested.
	 
	Motion To Approve Clarifying Edits to GNSO Operating Procedures

	23 November 2009

	 

	Whereas the GNSO Council approved its new GNSO Operating
Procedures during its 28 October 2009 meeting in Seoul;

	Whereas the GNSO Council Operations Work Team Chair advised
Council members in Seoul of the need to incorporate a number of
clarifying edits to the procedures that were not included in the final
draft of the procedures adopted by the Council;

	Whereas the edits are intended to simply clarify the original
procedural language recommended by the Work Team;

	Whereas the Work Team has been directed by the Council to
continue its work on a second phase of substantive Council procedural
recommendations including a further examination of the provisions for
voting abstentions;

	RESOLVED, the Council accepts the clarifying edits forwarded by
the Work Team (insert link here) and looks forward to the subsequent
substantive procedural recommendations to be developed by the Work Team.
Staff is directed to share the edited procedures with the Board and post
both clean and red-lined versions of the procedures on the GNSO Web
Page.

	Chuck

	 
	 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20091113/1ff15d4a/attachment.html>