[council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting

[William Drake]

People on their first cup of coffee get to make obvious typos,  
Adrian :-)

BD

On Oct 5, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:

> Interesting split.
>
> What are we going to discuss during the other 455 time? :P
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- 
> council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of William Drake
> Sent: Monday, 5 October 2009 5:37 PM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: Re: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I strongly agree with Stéphane and others that a probing discussion of
> GAC's role under the AoC is needed, maybe a 505/50 time split.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Oct 5, 2009, at 1:17 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
>
>>
>> I agree with Stéphane's second comment (discussing the Affirmation).
>>
>> What benefit could we possibly get out of discussing the DAG v3 with
>> them? We will know their opinion as they will make it public. I have
>> not found discussing the new gTLD's any benefit in the past and
>> can't see it changing.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Adrian Kinderis
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-
>> council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
>> Sent: Monday, 5 October 2009 2:17 AM
>> To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
>> Subject: Re: [council] Suggested topic for GAC-GNSO meeting
>>
>> Thanks Avri.
>>
>> The DAGv3 is obviously a topic of major interest. We may also wish
>> to ask
>> the GAC to tell us how they see their larger role within ICANN as a
>> result
>> of the Affirmation...
>>
>> Stéphane
>>
>>
>> Le 04/10/09 13:34, « Avri Doria » <avri at acm.org> a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thsi topic suggested by the chair of GAC is:
>>>
>>> *             Meeting with GNSO Council
>>> ·               New gTLD policy implementation (DAG v3)
>>>
>>>
>>> He is open to other topics if we would like to suggest one.
>>>
>>> Is the council ok with it, or would we prefer some other topic?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> a.
>>>
>>>
>>