[council] NCA Assignments

[William Drake]

Hi Chuck,

On Oct 8, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

>
> I do not believe your assessment is correct Avri.  My understanding is
> that Kristina communicated that the CSG supported seating Terry in the
> Non-Contracted Party House but I will let her speak for herself.
> Regarding the RySG, I sent an email supporting that as well.

Like I guess Avri I must have missed your message, when did you send it?

Either way, how would two of four SGs be sufficient?

Bill
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
>> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:26 AM
>> To: Council GNSO
>> Subject: Re: [council] NCA Assignments
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Because the motion the council passed required that the 4 SG
>> in consensus through their reps either agree to the NCA
>> recommendations or come up with another plan.
>>
>> As far as I can tell only the CSG agreed with the NCA
>> recommendations and there was no consensus on another plan by
>> 7 Oct, hence we fall through to the random selection.
>>
>> a.
>>
>> On 8 Oct 2009, at 10:11, Philip Sheppard wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Avri,
>>>
>>> I believe a preference has been expressed for Terry and the
>> NCP House.
>>> Why is this being ignored ?
>>> Philip
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
  Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************