AW: [council] Motion to Adopt Updated Council Operating Procedures

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I put it in, but reworded it a bit.  I think it still says the same  
thing, but please confirm.
https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?28_oct_motions

a.

On 27 Oct 2009, at 16:13, <KnobenW at telekom.de> <KnobenW at telekom.de>  
wrote:

> To cover the ongoing discussion it is intended to withdraw the  
> motion on the amendment and amend the motion itself in the way as  
> attached.
> I'll insert a revision deadline after having coordinated with the  
> work team.
>
> Is that acceptable?
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
> Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- 
> council at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2009 02:00
> An: Rosette, Kristina; council at gnso.icann.org
> Betreff: RE: [council] Motion to Adopt Updated Council Operating  
> Procedures
>
> The motion to amend the motion specifically deals with the  
> abstention issue.  If the amendment does not pass, then we could add  
> language like that.
>
> Chuck
>
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner- 
> council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2009 8:51 PM
> To: council at gnso.icann.org
> Subject: [council] Motion to Adopt Updated Council Operating  
> Procedures
>
> All,
>
> It is my understanding from our discussion yesterday that we had  
> rough consensus on voting to adopt the updated Council Operating  
> Procedures, but to state in the motion that certain areas remain  
> outstanding (e.g., abstentions) and to require that those areas be  
> priority work to be completed by a date certain.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1.  Is that correct?
>
> 2.  What areas, other than abstentions, remain outstanding?
>
> I'll start drafting a substitute motion once I've heard back from  
> enough of you so that I'm comfortable I'm on the right track.
>
> K
>
> <Motion-RoP_draft_rev.doc>