[council] NCAs in the new GNSO Council structure

[Gomes, Chuck]

Several have expressed views on this.  It would be helpful if we could
have more list discussion about the various options and any others
anyone proposes in the next week.  Our plan is to make a decision on
this along with the plan for seating Councilors in Seoul on 24
September.  Please get input from the groups you represent.
 
Thanks, Chuck


________________________________

	From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
	Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 2:48 PM
	To: GNSO Council
	Subject: [council] NCAs in the new GNSO Council structure
	
	
	Hi,
	as discussed yesterday in the conference call, and to start the
discussion in our list, I am including possible options for assigning
the role of the three NCAs in the new structure of the GNSO Council:
	
	

	Option a:  The NCAs talk it through and figure out which roles
seem right to them.

	Option b:  Random selection.

	Option c:  The council members decide with random selection of
which House chooses first.

	Option d:  The two Houses collaborate and decide among them
where the NCAs will be assigned.

	Option e:  The new, inexperienced NCA rep assumes the non-voting
Council seat and one of the above options is used to assign the two
House seats.

	Option f:   The experienced NCA rep assumes the non-voting
Coundil seat and one of the above options is used to assign the two
House seats
	

	Option g: (Combination of option a and d) The two Houses
collaborate and decide among them where the NCAs will be assigned, with
a refusal option by any of the NCAs.
	

	
	Please iclude other options thay you may think of and share your
comments about this in the list. 
	
	We should decide about this in our next GNSO conference call on
24 September.
	
	Best regards
	Olga
	
	
	
	
	

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20090910/c8003e46/attachment.html>