[council] RE: Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
Rosette, Kristina
krosette at cov.com
Wed Aug 4 16:45:23 UTC 2010
It could be sleep deprivation, but the third "Further resolved" doesn't seem to make any sense. Is it missing any words or is it me?
________________________________
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:20 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
Importance: High
On behalf of the RySG, I would like to propose an amended version of the motion to proceed with Whois Study # 1 on misuse. The proposed changes are highlighted in the attached file.
<<Motion Amendment for GNSO Council WHOIS Study 1 - 4 Aug 2010.docx>>
In my role as chair, I would like to ask Mike Rodenbaugh, who made the original motion, and Terry Davis, who seconded the motion, if they would consider the amendments friendly.
Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100804/8ed5060f/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list