[council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter Drafting Team

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks Bill.  I apologize if my question came across poorly.  I was simply trying to anticipate respresentation issues that might come up.  Mary's response was very helpful.
 
Chuck


________________________________

	From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch] 
	Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 3:16 AM
	To: Gomes, Chuck; GNSO Council List
	Subject: Re: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter Drafting Team
	
	
	Ditto Mary's explanation, the suggestion of two was not based on a SG representation model, but rather the value-added of the different orientations they'll bring to the table.  Which, per previous, will likely mesh in important respects with the views of other SGs rather than double representing a singular NCSG view. 

	Best,

	Bill
	



	On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:18 PM, Mary Wong wrote:


		Thanks to Liz and Chuck for their clarifications and suggestions.
		 
		I agree that the DT should be reasonably small, and would in this case personally prefer not to set numbers for each SG/SO/AC, or worry about matching/equivalence. In other situations and over other issues, equal representation of each group may be a fundamental concern, but in this case I believe NCSG is recommending Avri and Milton not because we believe we (or everyone) needs at least two (or however many) representatives. Rather, and for the reasons that Bill has stated, Avri and Milton will best represent NCSG in terms of what is likely to be a difficult preliminary issue (i.e. scoping out the WG). 
		 
		Cheers
		Mary
		 
		 
		 
		Mary W S Wong
		Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
		Franklin Pierce Law Center
		Two White Street
		Concord, NH 03301
		USA
		Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu
		Phone: 1-603-513-5143
		Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
		Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584


		>>> 
From: 	"Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>	
To:	 "William Drake" <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch>	
CC:	 Glen de Saint Géry<Glen at icann.org>, "GNSO Council List" <council at gnso.icann.org>	
Date: 	2/1/2010 4:33 PM	
Subject: 	RE: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter Drafting Team	
I wouldn't see any problem with that.  I just think it would be best to keep it as small as reasonably possible because of the short timeframe and limited task.  If the CSG wants three to cover three constituencies, would you want three?  (BTW, they have not asked for three.)
 
Chuck


________________________________

	From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch] 
	Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:28 PM
	To: Gomes, Chuck
	Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
	Subject: Re: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter Drafting Team
	
	
	Chuck, 

	Two.  There are some fundamental issues in the air about the proper scope and terms of reference for the WG that need to be sorted out by the DT.  Even if NCSG were to resolve its internal differences on these points, there would probably still be differences between the houses once the discussion gets to specifics. We're dealing with a rather variable geometry of perspectives, and as I say both people mentioned will add to working these things through.

	Best,

	Bill
	

	On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:09 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:


		Bill,
		 
		How many do you think the NCSG needs for the charter drafting team, not for the WG.
		 
		Chuck


________________________________

			From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch] 
			Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:59 PM
			To: Gomes, Chuck
			Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
			Subject: Re: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter Drafting Team
			
			
			Hi 

			And from NCSG, Avri Doria and Milton Mueller.  

			One participant from each SG would not work for NCSG, as we have a couple of contending perspectives in play, with multiple members aligned with each.  Avri and Milton have been very active and thoughtful proponents of those respective perspectives, both of which overlap/synergize in some ways with the positions advanced by other SGs.  Should be an interesting discussion...

			Best,

			Bill


			On Feb 1, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:


				Glen,
				 
				Please add Brian Cute from Afilias to this DT.
				 
				Thanks, Chuck
				 



	***********************************************************
	William J. Drake
	Senior Associate
	Centre for International Governance
	Graduate Institute of International and
	 Development Studies
	Geneva, Switzerland
	william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
	www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
	***********************************************************
	
	



	***********************************************************
	William J. Drake
	Senior Associate
	Centre for International Governance
	Graduate Institute of International and
	 Development Studies
	Geneva, Switzerland
	william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
	www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
	***********************************************************
	
	


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100202/396bba3e/attachment.html>