AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

On behalf of the ISPCP constituency I'd 
like to suggest the following edit regarding "Support Teams" (ST).
The draft amendment attached is targeted to provide more flexibility to the
Review Teams in order to let themselves organize their support teams rather than to constitute support teams in advance. 

Looking forward to a fruitful discussion
Wolf-Ulrich


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 23:35
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch; council at gnso.icann.org
Cc: ispcp at icann.org
Betreff: RE: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR

Thanks Wolf.  If you could propose a suggested edit, it would be very helpful.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org 
> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW at telekom.de
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:36 PM
> To: william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch; council at gnso.icann.org
> Cc: ispcp at icann.org
> Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
> 
> 
> Following a consultation within the ISPCP constituency I'd 
> like to address the creation of "Support Teams" (ST). There 
> must be a clear distinction between the RTs and potential STs 
> in order to avoid STs emerging to "shadow" RTs. So the 
> composition of the ST pools has carefully to be taken into 
> consideration or should even be regulated.  If applicable 
> this should be expressed in the council response.
> 
> Apart from that the ISPCP constituency endorses the draft response.
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org 
> [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von William Drake
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 16:40
> An: GNSO Council List
> Betreff: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Attached please find the drafting team's proposed response to 
> the draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements 
> and Implementation Processes, for discussion with our 
> respective SGs and in the Council.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Council_response_ISPCP_comment.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 20992 bytes
Desc: Council_response_ISPCP_comment.doc
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100127/a28ae358/Council_response_ISPCP_comment.doc>