[council] Draft Council letter on the ARR

[Gomes, Chuck]

Stephane is in a meeting at the moment and probably will not be able to respond until the meeting.
 
Chuck


________________________________

	From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch] 
	Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 5:18 AM
	To: Stéphane Van Gelder
	Cc: Gomes, Chuck; KnobenW at telekom.de; council at gnso.icann.org; ispcp at icann.org
	Subject: Re: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
	
	
	what about Rafik's amendment, submitted on behalf of NCSG: 



		
		I would like to submit this following edit regarding this part :
		
		
		"Obviously, any such communications would need to respect reasonable
		restrictions like the review teams' adherence to the Chatham House rule, and the SO/ACs should be expected to exercise prudence and to only make use of the opportunity when it is necessary to support the teams and/or convey major concerns."  
		
		
		with that one
		
		
		
		"It is expected that any communications or other input sought and received will be provided in good faith, and that SOs/ACs will exercise prudence and make use of the opportunity when it is necessary to support the teams and/or convey major concerns. In exceptional circumstances, a SO or AC, the review teams or members thereof may consider it necessary to subject such communications or other input to reasonable restrictions such as the Chatham House rule, and where this is the case, the relevant parties to the affected communication or input shall, as far as possible, be informed in advance."


	On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:


		Yes
		
		Le 27 janv. 2010 à 21:58, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
		
		


			I would accept this as a friendly amendment.  Stephan, as the seconder of the motion, would you also accept it as friendly?
			


			Glen - please add this amendment to the motion.
			


			Chuck 
			


				-----Original Message-----
				

				From: KnobenW at telekom.de [mailto:KnobenW at telekom.de] 
				

				Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:36 PM
				

				To: Gomes, Chuck; william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch; 
				

				council at gnso.icann.org
				

				Cc: ispcp at icann.org
				

				Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
				


				On behalf of the ISPCP constituency I'd like to suggest the 
				

				following edit regarding "Support Teams" (ST).
				

				The draft amendment attached is targeted to provide more 
				

				flexibility to the Review Teams in order to let themselves 
				

				organize their support teams rather than to constitute 
				

				support teams in advance. 
				


				Looking forward to a fruitful discussion Wolf-Ulrich
				



				-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
				

				Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
				

				Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2010 23:35
				

				An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch; 
				

				council at gnso.icann.org
				

				Cc: ispcp at icann.org
				

				Betreff: RE: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
				


				Thanks Wolf.  If you could propose a suggested edit, it would 
				

				be very helpful.
				


				Chuck 
				


					-----Original Message-----
					

					From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
					

					[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of 
					

				KnobenW at telekom.de
				

					Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:36 PM
					

					To: william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch; council at gnso.icann.org
					

					Cc: ispcp at icann.org
					

					Subject: AW: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
					



					Following a consultation within the ISPCP constituency I'd like to 
					

					address the creation of "Support Teams" (ST). There must be a clear 
					

					distinction between the RTs and potential STs in order to avoid STs 
					

					emerging to "shadow" RTs. So the composition of the ST pools has 
					

					carefully to be taken into consideration or should even be 
					

				regulated.  
				

					If applicable this should be expressed in the council response.
					


					Apart from that the ISPCP constituency endorses the draft response.
					


					Wolf-Ulrich
					




					-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
					

					Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
					

					[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von William Drake
					

					Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Januar 2010 16:40
					

					An: GNSO Council List
					

					Betreff: [council] Draft Council letter on the ARR
					


					Hello,
					


					Attached please find the drafting team's proposed response to the 
					

					draft proposal on the Affirmation Reviews Requirements and 
					

					Implementation Processes, for discussion with our 
					

				respective SGs and 
				

					in the Council.
					


					Best,
					


					Bill
					








	***********************************************************
	William J. Drake
	Senior Associate
	Centre for International Governance
	Graduate Institute of International and
	 Development Studies
	Geneva, Switzerland
	william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
	www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
	***********************************************************
	
	


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100128/35b7aede/attachment.html>