[council] RE: Ooops....[Re: Draft Council letter on the ARR]

Tim Ruiz tim at godaddy.com
Fri Jan 29 19:32:57 UTC 2010


Bill,

What I meant was that no objections were raised during the full Council
discussion and vote. 

Tim 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] RE: Ooops....[Re: Draft Council letter on the
ARR]
From: William Drake <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch>
Date: Fri, January 29, 2010 11:44 am
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>

Tim,
On Jan 29, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:

 There were no questions or objections raised regarding that
sentence so I believe it was assumed to be part of the letter. 




On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:

I disagree with the characterization and it will likely be an issue
among other Non-contracted party councilors.  Nonetheless, I agree that
the letter should go to Council for review, and we can tinker with it
later.





More information about the council mailing list