[council] RE: Ooops....[Re: Draft Council letter on the ARR]

[Alan Greenberg]

I agree. The concept if "GNSO registrants" is not one I had heard of before.

Alan

At 29/01/2010 02:56 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:

>I had originally flagged that language because it was not clear to me
>whether the reference to GNSO included individuals, which should, if
>we're being accurate, then require reference to At Large.
>
>I did not pick up on it through inadvertent oversight, not because it
>was not an issue.
>
>Now that I've read the actual report, I think the language is inaccurate
>because the report refers to "generic name registrants". (I assume
>reference to generic is used in contract to cc names.)
>
>I could live with "It might also be noted that registrants in gTLDs, the
>policies for which are developed by the GNSO, pay fees that fund well
>over 90% of ICANN's activities."
>
>Or, we could just take it out.
>
>K
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org]
>On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
>Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 2:33 PM
>To: William Drake
>Cc: GNSO Council List
>Subject: RE: [council] RE: Ooops....[Re: Draft Council letter on the
>ARR]
>
>
>Bill,
>
>What I meant was that no objections were raised during the full Council
>discussion and vote.
>
>Tim
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: Re: [council] RE: Ooops....[Re: Draft Council letter on the
>ARR]
>From: William Drake <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch>
>Date: Fri, January 29, 2010 11:44 am
>To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>Tim,
>On Jan 29, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
>
>  There were no questions or objections raised regarding that sentence so
>I believe it was assumed to be part of the letter.
>
>
>
>
>On Jan 19, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
>
>I disagree with the characterization and it will likely be an issue
>among other Non-contracted party councilors.  Nonetheless, I agree that
>the letter should go to Council for review, and we can tinker with it
>later.