[council] Prioritization Process - Motion

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Mon Jun 14 20:15:11 UTC 2010


Thank you very much Olga.  I wonder whether we should also request
comments on the process used at the same time.  What do others think?

 

In case there is support for an amendment like this, Ken would you
please draft an amendment and I will make it if appropriate.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org]
On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 3:40 PM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Prioritization Process - Motion

 

Hi,

I am sending the folowing motion for your consideration.

Best regards

Olga

 

GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization)

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a
resolution and timeline
<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>  to
conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of
procedures (proposed Chapter 6 and ANNEX
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf> )
recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT); 

WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the
first three of which have been completed as follows: 

1)      Step 1:  ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO
Council a recommended Work Prioritization Project List
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-e
n.pdf>  (v1.0), including a Cover Letter
<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-p
roject-list-30apr10-en.pdf> , on 30 April 2010 [Council approved on 20
May 2010 <http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/> ]

2)      Step 2:  Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total)
submitted individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects
(approved in Step 1) on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7
June), which were then successfully processed and aggregated by Staff
for input to Step 3; 

3)      Step 3:  The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group
discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully
finalized a set of Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects; 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization
Value Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June
2010 and directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO
website according to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100614/06ea8348/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list