[council] RE: AoC Reveiw Team Re-do...

Gomes, Chuck cgomes at verisign.com
Tue Mar 9 00:14:07 UTC 2010


How much is "some support"?
 
Chuck


________________________________

	From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
	Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 2:44 PM
	To: GNSO Council 
	Subject: [council] RE: AoC Reveiw Team Re-do...
	
	
	
	More explicitly, what I'm asking each SG to do during their
deliberations/voting on this is to note all the candidates that have at
least some support from their SG so the option below can be considered
by the Council. 
	

	Tim  

		-------- Original Message --------
		Subject: AoC Reveiw Team Re-do...
		From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim at godaddy.com>
		Date: Mon, March 08, 2010 1:36 pm
		To: "GNSO Council " <council at gnso.icann.org>
		
		Given what Janis and Peter said during the AoC Q&A this
morning
		including the fact that the review team will be larger
than first
		proposed, we should re-think our endorsement process and
only be
		considering who if any of the twelve we do not endorse
and submit the
		rest.
		
		I think this should be kept simple. If any of the
candidates have
		endorsement of at least one SG they are included. The
names would be
		submitted showing the SG(s) endorsement. This only
slightly changes what
		the SG are required to do (reverses it), and resolves
the gender and
		geographic issues since it leaves it to Janis and Peter
to sort out.
		
		This also gives the most number of candidates an
opportunity to be
		considered and give the GNSO the best shot at being
fully represented on
		the RT.
		
		
		Tim 
		
		

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100308/36aa8ac7/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list