[council] Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion

[Olga Cavalli]

Hi,
I agree with Mary and I also want to congratulate Stéphane for doing a great
job!
Regards
Olga

2010/3/10 Mary Wong <MWong at piercelaw.edu>

>  My thanks to Tim and everyone who worked on this motion - I'm glad we got
> to a final resolution!
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
>  *Mary W S Wong*
> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
> at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>
>
> >>>
>     *From: * "Tim Ruiz" <tim at godaddy.com> *To:* "GNSO Council " <
> council at gnso.icann.org> *Date: * 3/10/2010 3:29 AM *Subject: * [council]
> Friendly Amendments to VI Charter and Motion
>
> Two friendly amendments that I believe most agree resolves the remaining
> issues:
>
> Friendly amendment to the charter:
>
> Strike the definition for "Relationship between VI and CO."
>
> Friendly amendment to the motion to add the following resolve:
>
> Resolved further, that the WG is directed to  develop a version of
> objective 5 and to recommend it to the Council within three weeks for
> either (a) Council approval of the WG-recommended Objective 5  or (b)
> Council vote on which version of Objective 5 (as reflected in the draft
> Charter of March 10, 2010) should apply.
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100310/da1e5da7/attachment.html>