(SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition

Adrian Kinderis adrian at ausregistry.com.au
Thu Nov 11 01:53:45 UTC 2010


Right.

So you can be a member of each. Just not a voting member.

Adrian Kinderis


From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 8:47 AM
To: Alan Greenberg; Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition

I believe the revised Bylaws GNSO provisions require that someone may not vote in more than one SG or Constituency.

Chuck

From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:42 PM
To: Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Subject: Re: (SCL > 6): [council] ICANN Board Votes to Enhance New gTLDs Competition

The old Bylaws said that an organization could be a member of more than one Constituency. I would have sworn that the new Bylaws explicitly said that you could not participate in multiple SG and had to choose, but I cannot find that clause there. Is there a rule in either SG charter about multiple memberships??

Alan

At 10/11/2010 02:18 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
Wow!

http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09nov10-en.htm

So what happens to the Contracted Party house? Did they think of that? ;)


Adrian Kinderis


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20101111/b65ba809/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list