[council] Prioritizatio process

Stéphane Van Gelder stephane.vangelder at indom.com
Thu Nov 18 12:35:57 UTC 2010

Thanks Jaimie, and here's a short recap of what I was saying, as Chuck requested:

- Keep a model-based approach but simplify.
- Council Leadership could play a part in suggesting priority projects to Council, those suggestions based on model approach.
- Or we could take our thinking "outside the box". One idea: use US Congress style system of wiping the slate clean at the end of each calendar year. Others will no doubt have different ideas to suggest as well.


Le 18 nov. 2010 à 13:09, Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf a écrit :

> Chuck,
> As you asked me to put in writing my thoughts shared during today’s call on prioritization of GNSO work, here they are.
> I would like the Council to consider doing an annual update of the process brought up by the WG, because of two benefits
> 1)      Improving general awareness by the Councli members of the work going on;
> 2)      A valuable tool for leadership in figuring the degree of consensus on the relative value of the different projects.
> Jaime Wagner
> jaime at powerself.com.br
> Direto (51) 3219-5955  Cel (51) 8126-0916
> Geral  (51) 3233-3551  DDG: 0800-703-6366
> www.powerself.com.br

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20101118/5ecc3fd3/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list