[council] RE: Motion re. VI WG

Adrian Kinderis adrian at ausregistry.com.au
Fri Oct 1 01:14:08 UTC 2010


I second.

Adrian Kinderis


From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, 30 September 2010 10:37 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Subject: [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG


I  am accepting one of Adrian's suggested amendments to this motion as friendly and change it as highlighted in the attached file.  Other suggested amendments are welcome.  Note also that a second is needed.

Chuck <<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc>>

_____________________________________________
From: Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:53 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Motion re. VI WG

 << File: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc >>

In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI and in order to meet the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am submitting this motion and would appreciate a second.  Please forward this to your SGs and constituencies to determine support for the motion on 7 October.

I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this, but thought that a motion is a clear way to kick it off.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20101001/95ad4096/attachment.html>


More information about the council mailing list