[council] Kurt Question

[Tim Ruiz]

Seems that the Board should have asked for a release candidate in
conjunction with the recent resolutions. Perhaps that is the intent,
with the few more or less clean up items that were noted. At least I
certainly hope so. 


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Kurt Question
> From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian at ausregistry.com.au>
> Date: Fri, October 08, 2010 12:52 am
> To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>,        Council GNSO
> <council at gnso.icann.org>
> 
> Thanks Bruce. Very firm. I like it.
> 
> However, it is all in how you look at it.
> 
> The staff can certainly put something forward that they may consider "final" and yes the Board may not approve it. However, the staff could still have thought that they were "final".
> 
> My question was to Kurt, and therefore staff, in that, does he believe that the next version will be the one they expect the Board to sign off on or will it be sent back for public comment.
> 
> A legitimate question given staff's history of announcing that they expect future drafts every time they have released one.
> 
> A response would be appreciated.
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 3:50 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: RE: [council] Kurt Question
> 
> 
> Hello Adrian,
> 
> 
> >>  Does that mean there will be others and the next won't be "final"?
> 
> It will be final when the Board approves it.  Until then it is always a
> draft.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20101008/a0f1ee64/attachment.html>