AW: [council] Motion re. VI WG

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

Shouldn't we mention the co-chairs' intention to provide the final
report before 18 November - in case there is a chance to reach consensus
positions by that date?

Wolf-Ulrich 


________________________________

	Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
	Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. September 2010 19:53
	An: Council GNSO
	Betreff: [council] Motion re. VI WG 
	
	

	<<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc>> 

	In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI and in
order to meet the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am submitting
this motion and would appreciate a second.  Please forward this to your
SGs and constituencies to determine support for the motion on 7 October.

	

	I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this, but
thought that a motion is a clear way to kick it off.

	Chuck

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100930/5d3f6e6a/attachment.html>