AW: [council] Motion re. VI WG

[KnobenW at telekom.de]

Chuck,
 
your E-Mail just crossed my related amendment suggestion. If there is no
real chance for consensus until the "final" report shall be provided
then the amendment is not necessary.
 

Wolf-Ulrich


________________________________

	Von: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com] 
	Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. September 2010 15:21
	An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; council at gnso.icann.org
	Betreff: RE: [council] Motion re. VI WG 
	
	

	Good question Wolf.  My understanding from my limited monitoring
of the VI PDP WG email list is that discussions are still ongoing as to
whether it will be called a final report as well as whether there will
be continued effort to reach consensus on any items.  I would rather not
set expectations that may not be met without direction from the WG.
Also, it seems to me that 18 November could very well be after the
posting of the next version of the applicant guidebook because, if there
is a 30-day comment period leading up to the Cartagena Board meeting, it
probably would need to posted not later than 9 November.  If my
estimates are correct, it would seem to be too late for any consensus
items to be considered for inclusion in the posted guidebook.

	 

	Regarding the latter point, I have communicated this issue to
the WG co-chairs.

	 

	Chuck

	 

	From: KnobenW at telekom.de [mailto:KnobenW at telekom.de] 
	Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:05 AM
	To: Gomes, Chuck; council at gnso.icann.org
	Subject: AW: [council] Motion re. VI WG 

	 

	Shouldn't we mention the co-chairs' intention to provide the
final report before 18 November - in case there is a chance to reach
consensus positions by that date?

	
	Wolf-Ulrich 

		 

		
________________________________


		Von: owner-council at gnso.icann.org
[mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
		Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. September 2010 19:53
		An: Council GNSO
		Betreff: [council] Motion re. VI WG 

		<<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc>> 

		In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI
and in order to meet the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am
submitting this motion and would appreciate a second.  Please forward
this to your SGs and constituencies to determine support for the motion
on 7 October.

		I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this,
but thought that a motion is a clear way to kick it off.

		Chuck

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20100930/e1e34435/attachment.html>