[council] Re: Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG)
rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Wed Apr 13 18:20:56 UTC 2011
2011/4/14 Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us>
> As much as I love being told I am “incoherent”, I have to admit I don’t
> understand your response. Literally, I have no idea what you are trying to
I said "incoherent position" that is quite different than calling you
"incoherent". just for clarification.
> If you recall during the Council meeting, I wanted to remove the words
> “forward to the Board” from the resolution in this case, because the ccNSO
> had not yet had a chance to weigh in on it. I was afraid that they may not
> agree with everything and if they did not, then we would have to work things
> out with the ccNSO to ensure consistency. Once we had a report that we could
> both support, only then should we forward to the Board. To do otherwise
> would be for the GNSO to forward 1 version of the report, the ccNSO would
> forward another version, and somehow we would expect the Board to resolve
> the differences. To me, that seems unworkable and contrary to bottom-up
> policy making.
and how we will fix that? it is deadlock otherwise we are prioritizing the
response of SO than other .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the council