[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Fwd: [council] Concerns over JAS Working Group and Violations of its Charter
tim at godaddy.com
Wed Apr 13 19:16:03 UTC 2011
A lot of people put a lot of effort into defining and refining our
policy development process over the years. The concerns I have are that
the CWG does not replace or undermine that. I believe that is what
others have expressed concern about as well. Calling that
micromanagement is out of line and just not true.
Some have bemoaned what they see as unnecessary process. However,
process is what protects this system. Without it, anyone at any time
could question the validity of what is done and there would be no
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Fwd: [council] Concerns over JAS
> Working Group and Violations of its Charter
> From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, April 13, 2011 1:07 pm
> To: StÃ©phane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder at indom.com>
> Cc: "council at gnso.icann.org GNSO" <council at gnso.icann.org>,
> Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> The worries that some on this Council have expressed about the way joint groups work and the risk of seeing them step outside the bounds of the Bottom-up Policy Development Process are clearly real in this context.
> the irony is to talk about Bottom-up PDP which is in the meantime hurt by the attempt of micromanagement I am observing from some in GNSO council .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the council